Several other categories to consider when analyzing a character are—
Relationships: The author has chosen to connect your character with others for specific purposes, so it is important to consider why he or she has this type of best friend, enemy, sibling, parent. How does your character influence others, and vice versa? What do his or her interactions with other reveal about this character? Has the author created a foil (a character who is opposite in traits) to further highlight your character as they interact?
Author’s Purpose: Is this character static (remaining much the same throughout the story) or dynamic (altered as a person by the events of the story)? Round (a fully developed and complex character) or flat (given only a few traits)? Is this character an archetype (a somewhat stereotypical personality like the bully, the nerd, the girl in distress, the favored athlete) or much more complex and unique? Overall, what is the author’s purpose for creating this precise character for the novel, such as developing a theme or presenting a life lesson?
Organization: Once you have answered all the various questions about your character, you will next decide how to organize your analysis. If it is to be an essay, you will likely use the five paragraph formula: introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion. The introduction should grab readers’ attention, reference the title and author of the novel or story, and present your purpose in a clear thesis statement. The thesis generally lists your three subtopics in the order you will write about them, usually least to most important.
To choose your three subtopics, you might simply select the three most important characterization aspects, such as personality, motivation, and author’s purpose. Many of the other aspects of character (previously listed) can be explained as part of the categories you choose. Another organization method for characters who are round and dynamic, you might consider a chronological organization pattern. Body paragraph one analyzes what type of person the character is in the beginning; paragraph two discusses how he or she is affected by the story’s events; paragraph three analyzes the resulting changes in the character as a whole. As always, weave your analysis of other important aspects of character into the subtopics wherever they naturally fit.
Essay about A Character Analysis of Hamlet
1897 Words8 Pages
Hamlet fascinates many readers and the first thing to point out about him is that he is mysterious. Shakespeare's work demonstrates Hamlet's dilemma as the role of revenger showing a man of thought forced to be a man of action. Hamlet is extremely philosophical and introspective. He is particularly drawn to difficult questions or questions that cannot be answered with any certainty. Faced with evidence that his uncle murdered his father, Hamlet becomes obsessed with proving his uncle's guilt before trying to act. He is equally overwhelmed with questions about the afterlife, about the wisdom of suicide, and about what happens to bodies after they die.
However, even though he is thoughtful to the point of obsession, Hamlet also behaves…show more content…
The soliloquies create an effect on the audience showing that Hamlet is depressed and confused. When he speaks, he sounds as if there is something important he is not saying, maybe something even he is unaware of, creating the sense that Hamlet's character, a philosopher, is extremely troubled at becoming a man of action.
In Hamlet's second soliloquy, Act 2, Scene 2, his speech moves through anger, self-condemnation and agonised self-accusation, impassioned fury and mocking self criticism, deep reflection and determination. He continuously points out his faults on how he cannot raise himself to adequate passion to avenge for his father's murder, he comments on how the actor showed grief for his lines, and how he cannot, even though he has great reason to. Hamlet's mood is far beyond normal and has gone into philosophical realms, continuously using metaphors to show his disgust and anguish for himself and his attitudes to the current affairs in the state of his own home.
The soliloquy opens with Hamlet cursing himself as a `rogue and peasant slave'. Hamlet expresses an outburst of hatred, linking it to the actor when he describes the actor's passion.
Hamlet is outraged that he is not able to shed tears, and when he says `fiction' he is disappointed to see that a man can make himself cry through a second-hand play, whereas he cannot. Hamlet's outrage here demonstrates his dilemma as the `man of thought' forced to